External Evaluations
Danone’s commitments and achievements regarding its sustainability priorities are externally assessed.
The Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings, which assess us on our overall sustainability strategy (MSCI, Vigeo-Eiris, Sustainalytics...), address mainly financial audience whereas thematic rankings, which assess us on specific topics such as nutrition and health issues (ATNI), climate change (CDP) or gender equality (Bloomberg Gender Equality Index), address a broader scope of stakeholders.
Today there are several ratings and rankings in which we take part, but we cannot actively participate in all of them. We have therefore prioritized our participation according to the following criteria:
- Their relevance in regard to our strategic priorities and commitments.
- The robustness of their approach and methodology as well as their expertise on the topics they deal with. They represent external proof points for the stakeholders they target.
- The efficient allocation of our resources which should not prevent us from focusing our efforts on our priorities and our performance.
- Their rating process which provide us with insights enabling us to improve our performance and strategic focus.
- The assessment of our main competitors and industry peers, allowing our stakeholders to compare and benchmark.